Publishing Criteria
Yazım Kuralları
Dyscalculia Academy Journal’a gönderilecek çalışmalar aşağıdaki ” Makale Şablonları ” üzerinde hazırlanmalıdır.
Türkçe Makale Şablonu | İngilizce Makale Şablonu
Sayfa Düzeni: A4 Dikey, Kenar Boşlukları (Normal) (4 yandan 2,5cm)
Dyscalculia Academy Journal, makale sayfa sayısı veya kelime sayısı ile ilgili sınırlama getirmemektedir. Ancak yayın kurulu veya bilim kurulu çalışmanın niteliğini kaybetmeden kısaltılabileceği yönünde görüş belirtebilir.
Her çalışma sırasıyla aşağıdaki ana başlıklardan oluşmalıdır.
Her çalışma sırasıyla aşağıdaki ana başlıklardan oluşmalıdır;
Başlık
Çalışmanın başlığı, içeriğini açık şekilde yansıtmalı ve kapsayıcı nitelikte olmalıdır. Bağlaçlar hariç her kelimenin baş harfi büyük yazılmalıdır.
Öz
Çalışmanın amacını, kapsamını, yöntemini, sonuçlarını, öne çıkan yanlarını ve özgün değerini açık ve kısa bir şekilde yansıtmalıdır. Kelime sınırlaması getirilmelidir.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Çalışmanın bütünlüğünü yansıtan en az 5 anahtar kelime belirlenmelidir.
Giriş
Araştırma konusunun temeli, çalışmanın bölümlerine yönelik özet bilgi, bilimsel alanyazındaki karşılığı, araştırmanın önemi, araştırma problemi ve amaçları giriş kısmında detaylandırılmalıdır.
Yöntem
Araştırma deseni, araştırma grubu veya katılımcılar, veri toplama araçları ve verilerin toplanması, verilerin analizi, geçerlik ve güvenirlik, sınırlılıklar, gerekli ise etik kurul onayı yöntem başlığı altında detaylandırılmalıdır.
Bulgular
Araştırmada elde edilen bulgular; çalışmanın amacı ve problemini destekler nitelikte ve bütünlüğü koruyacak biçimde ilgili tablo, şekil, grafik veya resimlerle açıklanmalıdır.
Tartışma *
Araştırmanın önemi ışığında, elde edilen bulgular alanyazın ve yazar yorumları ile tartışılmalıdır.
Sonuç *
Sonuç kısmında tartışmalar ışığında ortaya çıkan ana fikirler açıklanmalıdır.
Öneriler *
Çalışmanın tartışma ve sonucuna uygun önerilerde bulunulmalıdır. Ayrıca alanyazına katkı sağlayacak, gelecekte yapılabilecek çalışmalara ve alandaki uygulamalara yönelik önerileri de içermelidir.
Teşekkür **
Araştırmanın ortaya çıkarılması aşamasında küçük katkı sağlamış kişi veya kurumlara teşekkürler belirtilmelidir.
Kaynakça
Kaynakça APA 7 kaynak gösterme esasları doğrultusunda hazırlanmalıdır. Metin içi gönderme ve atıflar tam metnin diline uygun verilmelidir. Türkçe tam metin için Türkçe kaynak gösterme usul ve esasları, İngilizce tam metin için İngilizce kaynak gösterme usul ve esasları dikkate alınmalıdır.
Font ailesi Palatino Linotype ve satır aralığı 3 nk olacak şekilde verilmelidir. Girinti 4. Harf altına gelecek şekilde verilmelidir.
Ekler **
Ek tablo, şekil, grafik ve resimler kaynakça sonrasında yeni bir sayfada verilmelidir. Her bir ek için Ek 1., Ek 2. gibi sınıflandırılmalı ve her bir ek ayrı ayrı başlıklandırılmalıdır.
** Tartışma, Sonuç ve Öneriler yazarlar tarafından tek başlık altında toplanabileceği gibi ayrı ayrı da verilebilir.*
*** Teşekkür ve Ek bilgileri yer alması durumunda bu başlıklar Giriş, Yöntem gibi ana başlık şeklinde verilmelidir.*
Tablo ve Şekiller
Tablo ve Şekil başlık ve metin özellikleri Şablon içerisindeki örneklerdeki yapı dikkate alınarak verilmelidir.
Tablo ve Şekillerden öncesine ve sonrasına 12 nk boşluk verilir.
Tablo başlıkları ve metin 10 Punto
Tablo ve Numarası Koyu Örn. Tablo 1. Tablo Başlığı
Şekil eğer grafik ve düzenlenebilir bir formatta ise başlık ve iç metinler 10 punto
Şekil ve Numarası Koyu Örn. Şekil 1. Şekil Başlığı
Şekiller bir resim veya düzenlenemez bir görsel içeriyorsa 300 DPI çözünürlüğünde Word içerisinde aktarılmalı ve Makale Gönderme basamaklarının 4. Basamağında Ek Bir Dosya Yükle seçeneği ile orijinal şekil yüklenmelidir.
Kaynakça Örnekleri
Kitap
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum (20. bs.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
Gönderme: (Büyüköztürk, 2014, s. 194)
Kitap İçi Bölüm
Bayır, D. (1997). USMARC uygulamasına genel bir bakış. B. Yılmaz (Yay. Haz.). Kütüphanecilik Bölümü 25.Yıl’a armağan içinde (s. 199-218). Ankara: Hacettepe üniversitesi Kütüphanecilik Bölümü.
Gönderme: (Bayır, 1997, s. 207)
Çeviri Kitap
Lewis, B. (2000). Modern Türkiye’nin doğuşu (M. Kıratlı, çev.). Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.
Gönderme: Lewis, 2000, s. 12
Makale
Karakelle, S. (2012). Üstbilişsel farkındalık, zeka, problem çözme algısı ve düşünme ihtiyacı arasındaki bağlantılar. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(164), 237-250. doi:10.15390/EB.2014.3078
Gönderme: (Karakelle, 2012, s. 245)
Elektronik Makale
Karakelle, S. (2012). Üstbilişsel farkındalık, zeka, problem çözme algısı ve düşünme ihtiyacı arasındaki bağlantılar. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(164), 237-250. http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/779/376 adresinden erişildi.
Gönderme: (Karakelle, 2012, s. 240)
Tez
Mantar, E. (2003). Kütüphanecilikte sürekli eğitim: Ankara’da bulunan üniversite kütüphaneleri üzerine bir inceleme. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Hacettepe üniversitesi, Ankara.
Gönderme: (Mantar, 2003, s. 67)
Bildiri
Çakmak, T. ve Körpeoğlu, H. (2012). Web content management within the organizational identity framework: A Study for Hacettepe University Department of Information Management web content management system. BOBCATSSS 2012 Information in E-motion 23-25 Ocak 2012 içinde (s. 91-93). Amsterdam: Hogeschool van Amsterdam.
Gönderme: (Çakmak ve Körpeoğlu, 2012, s. 92)
Web Sayfası
UNESCO. (2013). World Heritage list. http://whc.unesco.org/en/list adresinden erişildi.
Gönderme: (UNESCO, 2013)
Copyright Notice
The manuscripts submitted to JODYAC for publication must be original studies that have not been published before or submitted to anywhere else for publication.
Authors who submit their studies to JODYAC have to agree that they have to transfer the copyright of their studies to Dyscalculia Association. The editorial board of JODYAC is authorized to publish the study. However, the following rights of the authors are reserved;
- Patent rights,
- All unregistered rights apart from copyright,
- Duplication rights on condition that the study is not sold,
- The right of the author to use the whole or parts of the study in the author’s own books or other academic studies on condition that reference is given,
- The right to have it on personal websites or open archive of their university on condition that the copyright details are indicated.
Authors who will submit their studies to JODYAC must fill in the “Copyright Transfer Form”. The author(s) must sign the completed form with a wet signature. The signed form should be scanned and uploaded to the system via file upload option in the 4th step of submitting manuscripts to the journal. At the same time, the wet-signed form must be posted to the following address: ” Dyscalculia Academy Journal Hürriyet, Yağmur apt, Alay Cad. No:18, 49120 Muş, Türkiye”. The studies of the authors who don’t submit the Copyright Transfer Form form will not be published.
All the articles published in JODYAC are licensed under “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License”. This license grants the right to copy, share and redistribute all the articles, data sets, graphics and supplementary files published in this journal in data mining, search engines, websites, blogs and other platforms, under the condition of providing references. Open access is an approach that facilitates the interdisciplinary communication and encourages cooperation different disciplines to work with each other. JODYAC, contributes to its own field by providing more access to its articles and a more transparent review process.
Approval of Ethics Committee
Ethics committee in the social sciences that evaluates research proposals in order to protect human rights before, during and after the research, to prevent them from harm, and to obtain informed consent. This committee examines the submitted research in terms of the above-mentioned dimensions and if it is appropriate issues an ethics committee approval document and issues a related document.
- Ethics committee approval document should be submitted for all manuscripts.
- For the manuscript that does not require the Approval of Ethics Committee, researchers should submit the official document showing that they do not require ethics committee approval to be obtained from the ethics committee of their institution.
- Researchers who are not affiliated with any institution should apply to the ethics commitee of the universities in their province before the data collection process of their studies and obtain an ethics committee approval certificate.
- For the manuscript produced from theses, it is sufficient to submit the Approval of Ethics Committee received for the thesis. A separate Approval of Ethics Committee document is not expected for these manuscripts.
*Institutional and individual research and application permissions obtained for the research are not accepted as an approval of the Ethics Committee.
Review Process
Peer Review Process
Blind review is a method used to make sure scientific publications are produced with the highest quality. This method forms the basis of the objective review process of scientific studies and is preferred by many scientific studies. Reviewer views are determinant in the publication quality of JODYAC. All manuscripts submitted to JODYAC are blind reviewed according to the following stages:
Blind Review Method
JODYAC, uses the double blind review method in the review process of all studies. In the double blind review method, the identities of the authors and reviewers are hidden.
Initial Review Process
The studies submitted to JODYAC are first evaluated by the editors. At this stage, the studies which are not related with the journal’s aim and scope, weak in terms of language and expression rules in Turkish and English, lack originality, contain critical scientific errors and do not meet the publication policies are rejected. The authors of rejected studies are informed in two months following the submission date. The studies that are found suitable are sent to a field editor related with the subject of study.
Pre-review Process
In the pre-review process, the field editors examine the introduction and literature, method, findings, results, discussion parts of the studies in detail in terms of journal publication policies and scope and originality. Those studies that are found suitable as a result of this examination are returned within one month at the latest together with the field editor report. And the studies which are found suitable are assigned to reviewers.
Assigning Reviewers
The studies are refereed according to the content and the expertise of the referees. The field editor who reviews the study recommends two reviewers, based on their subject of expertise, from the reviewer pool of JODYAC or may recommend a new reviewer related with the subject of study addressed in the article. The suggestions are evaluated by the editors and the studies are forwarded to the reviewers. The reviewers have to guarantee that they will not share any process and document about the studies they review.
Reviewer Reports
In general, the reviewer reports are based on the originality of the studies, methods, ethical considerations, consistent presentation of the findings and results and review of the literature. This evaluation is based on the following elements:
1. Introduction and literature: the reviewer report includes the presentation of the problem addressed in the study and it aims, the importance of the subject, the scope of the literatüre on the subject, its actuality and the originality of the study.
2. Method: the reviewer report includes views about the suitability of the research method, sample choice and properties, validity and reliability, as well as an opinion on the data collection and data analysis process.
- Findings: the reviewer report includes views about the presentation of the findings obtained through the method, the accuracy of the analysis methods, the consistency of the findings with the aim of the research, the presentation of tables, figures and visuals that are needed, and the evaluation of the tests used.
4. Evaluation and Discussion: the reviewer report includes views about discussions based on findings, the relevance to the research question(s) and hypothesis(ses), generalizability and applicability.
5. Results and Suggestions: the reviewer report includes views about contribution to literature, recommendations for future studies and suggestions about applications in the field.
6. Style and Wording: the reviewer report includes views about the content of the study title, the proper use of Turkish, the references and references being given in accordance with the language of the full text in accordance with the APA 7 rules.
7. Overall Evaluation: the reviewer report includes views about the originality of the study as a whole, its contribution to the education literature and practices in the field.
In the review process, reviewers are not expected to make corrections according to the typographic features of the study.
Reviewing Process
Reviewers are given 6 weeks for review. Corrections from reviewers or editors must be completed by the authors within 1 month in line with the “editing manual”. Reviewers can request more than one correction if necessary.
Review Result
The field editor evaluates the review by reviewers within 2 weeks at the latest. As a result of this evaluation, the field editor conveys his/her final decision to the editors.
Editorial Board Decision
Based on the comments of the Field Editor and Referee, the Editorial Board prepares conclusions regarding the study. The Editor must deliver the prepared opinions, along with the Field Editor’s and Referee’s proposals, to the author(s) within a week at the latest. Studies that have negative evaluations in this phase are sent back without a request for a plagiarism check. The outcomes of the reports from the plagiarism inspection are used to make the final judgment for research with favorable evaluations.
How Long Does the Publication Evaluation Process Take?
It is seen that the publication evaluation process of the studies submitted to JODYAC is finalized in approximately six months. However, the period between the date when the referees or editors request corrections from the author(s) and the date when the author(s) complete the corrections is not included in this six-month period.
Online Guide
Online Study Submission Guide
Authors who wish to submit a study for evaluation in JODYAC can do so by becoming a member of the journal management system on the journal website. They must follow the instructions in the “Online Study Submission Guide” in order to become a member and submit a study.
Correction Instruction and Uploading Guide
Editors, field editors, and referees may request one or more corrections and improvements for the studies in the evaluation process at JODYAC.
The author(s) is responsible for completing the corrections and improvements in a comprehensive, explanatory, and timely manner, understanding that the requested corrections and improvements are objective and enhance the originality of the work.
The author(s) should upload the requested corrections and improvements to the system according to the conditions outlined in the “Correction Instructions and Upload Guide”.
Study/Article Withdrawal
JODYAC cares about holistic and complete publishing for researchers and librarians, and is aware that providing this requires publishing reliable original research articles. In accordance with JODYAC’s publication policies, the duties and responsibilities of the author(s) and the editorial board during the withdrawal of a study or article are outlined below.
Authors
The author(s) have a duty to assist the journal editor in the retraction process if they discover a mistake or mistakes in their published, early appearance, or evaluation work. The “Withdrawal Form” must be completed by the author(s) who wish to withdraw their work from consideration during the review period, and a scanned and signed copy of each author must be emailed to the editorial board. The Editorial Board will consider the withdrawal request and react no later than one week from the time it is received. The request for withdrawal of the studies whose copyrights have been transferred by the editorial board at the Dyscalculia Academy Journal submission stage must be accepted before the authors can submit their work to another journal for evaluation.
Editors
The JODYAC Editorial Board has an obligation to initiate an investigation into a published, early-view, or under-evaluation work if there is suspicion of copyright or plagiarism. If the Editorial Board detects copyright or plagiarism in the work under evaluation as a result of the investigation, it withdraws the work from evaluation and returns the detected cases to the authors, citing the sources in detail. If the Editorial Board detects copyright infringement or plagiarism in a published or early-view work, the withdrawal and notification procedures must be carried out within one week.
The work in which ethical violations are detected is withdrawn and the phrase “Withdrawn:” is added at the beginning of the title in the electronic display.
Instead of the Abstract and Full Text contents in the electronic display, the reasons for the withdrawal of the study and, if there are detailed sources of evidence, are published together with the notifications of the institutions and organizations to which the author(s) are affiliated.
Notice of withdrawal is announced on the home page of the journal website and the electronic and hard copy of the first issue to be published as of the date of retraction is added to the list of contents as “Retracted: Working Title”, with the reasons for the retraction and the original citations cited for it shared with the public and researchers, starting from the first page.
The withdrawal notices are also sent to the organization(s) to which the author(s) is affiliated, as well as to the institutions and organizations where the journal is indexed, and to the National Library Presidency for registration in index systems and catalogues.
In addition, the editorial board may recommend to publishers or editorial boards of previously published studies of the author(s) of the ethically violated study to assure the validity and reliability of the published studies or to withdraw them.
Objecting to the Evaluation Result
The editorial board and scientific committee’s recommendations that were forwarded to the author(s) as a consequence of the evaluation in JODYAC are subject to objection by the author(s). The author(s) should email their email address the grounds for complaint regarding the opinions and remarks resulting from the evaluation made for their work in a scientific language, mentioning their sources. The editorial board reviews the objections within a month at the latest (opinions regarding the objections can be requested of the field editor and study reviewers), and the author is informed of the results either positively or negatively (s). The editorial board restarts the assessment process by conducting a new refereeing in accordance with the study’s subject area if the author(s)’ complaints to the evaluation result are judged to be valid.